🔗 Share this article

Each time a significant honors show approaches, there’s always a clamor to include fresh award types to acknowledge overlooked contributions and fill the passions of enthusiasts with niche passions.

A fellow writer has already made for a horror game category. That would rule. Equally deserving are strategy board titles, this being a passionate advocate's mission. But they will have to forgive me when I prioritize since similar to dedicated enthusiasts, there's a strong justification supporting my request remains most pressing above others. Here's the proposal: We need an award type for logic-based games.

Categorizing Game Types

Organizing artistic expressions defies precise measurement; it remains highly personal, and typically start arguments resulting in unclear classifications. It's understandable that movie academies avoid this approach. But it is a necessary evil in the world of interactive entertainment, which are so diverse it's challenging to consider them as a single art form.

For the full spectrum of interactive entertainment excellence to receive acknowledgment, and for games of all stripes to receive proper recognition, classification by type becomes crucial.

Existing Game Classification System

Leading game ceremonies offer these classifications covering Action, Action/Adventure, Role-Playing, Combat games, Simulation and strategy titles, plus athletic and racing experiences. Collectively, these award types actually cover a lot of ground, making space possible for most games within them.

Not so for brain-teasing titles. No appropriate category exists to put them. Think about these recent excellent titles, each quite distinct: building puzzles in a particular game, the pulse-pounding block-matching in a different title, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles in another game. Which classification works within current classifications? Nowhere, that’s where.

The Representation Problem

Numerous examples exist excellent brain-teasers published annually lacking appropriate categories during gaming ceremonies, if they accidentally match for categories like Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, and the highly challenging Indie races.

• One classic puzzle game got overlooked in any category that year
• A different innovative game was excluded in 2019
• Popular arranging title got ignored recently
• Only a few brain-teasers scraped into niche award types

Value of Brain-Teasers

Commonly they're small games, yet the craft in brain-teasers holds tremendous importance. Well-known matching games count as the most-played games globally and have been for an extended period.

The legendary block-stacking game challenges well-known building titles claiming status as most purchased experience; it’s also in the running for best game of all time. Logic titles represent cornerstones to the art of video games, while interacting with diverse game types.

The Solution and Justification

Logic titles wouldn't face this problem. It would be easy to populate a field of five engaging, different, qualified experiences annually without trouble — actually, with challenge, given the need to exclude so many good games out.

And to reiterate, these include experiences without proper classification in important events. Brain-teaser creators function at the demanding boundary of video game design, producing among the purest expressions within interactive entertainment. Comparable to movie stunt professionals, they merit acknowledgment. We shouldn't delay decades.